“Paul and ‘Established’ Religion”

Home / KQ2 / “Paul and ‘Established’ Religion”
Part 6 –
“Paul and ‘Established’ Religion”
Review of the salutations to churches in chronological order revealed that the omission of “saints” in the intro to Galatians is consistent with the stylistic development in Paul’s epistles. This episode addresses a natural follow-up question: why did Paul fail to mention “church” in his salutations in his last 4 letters? Was his address to “saints” an intentional swipe at established churches in preference to the more personal and individual address to “saints?” In Augustinian terms, was Paul preferring the “invisible church” [“saints”] over against the established “visible church?” No evidence in the Pauline corpus indicates a demotion in Paul’s mind of the visible church, for Paul seems to presume that visible churches are mostly comprised of genuine saints. And the visible church is the primary means of Christian growth. The five-fold ministry of Christians leadership mentioned in Ephesians 4:11-13 is indispensable for Christian growth. So Paul’s omission of “church” in his salutations of his last 4 church letters should NOT be interpreted as Paul’s “developing theology” in which the visible church matters less than maverick saints.
  • 00:00:12 – Introduction to Kingdom Questions
  • 00:00:35 – Question on Galatians and Saints
  • 00:01:47 – Paul’s Letter Chronology
  • 00:03:02 – Inclusion of Saints in Corinthians
  • 00:04:55 – Emphasizing Identity in Christ
  • 00:06:00 – Pattern in Remaining Letters
  • 00:07:02 – The Significance of the Term “Saint”
  • 00:09:40 – Understanding Imputed Holiness
  • 00:12:00 – Embracing Your Identity as a Saint
  • 00:13:03 – Closing Prayer and Conclusion
Part 6 –
“Paul and ‘Established’ Religion”
  • 00:00:12 – Introduction to Kingdom Questions
  • 00:00:35 – Question on Galatians and Saints
  • 00:01:47 – Paul’s Letter Chronology
  • 00:03:02 – Inclusion of Saints in Corinthians
  • 00:04:55 – Emphasizing Identity in Christ
  • 00:06:00 – Pattern in Remaining Letters
  • 00:07:02 – The Significance of the Term “Saint”
  • 00:09:40 – Understanding Imputed Holiness
  • 00:12:00 – Embracing Your Identity as a Saint
  • 00:13:03 – Closing Prayer and Conclusion
Review of the salutations to churches in chronological order revealed that the omission of “saints” in the intro to Galatians is consistent with the stylistic development in Paul’s epistles. This episode addresses a natural follow-up question: why did Paul fail to mention “church” in his salutations in his last 4 letters? Was his address to “saints” an intentional swipe at established churches in preference to the more personal and individual address to “saints?” In Augustinian terms, was Paul preferring the “invisible church” [“saints”] over against the established “visible church?” No evidence in the Pauline corpus indicates a demotion in Paul’s mind of the visible church, for Paul seems to presume that visible churches are mostly comprised of genuine saints. And the visible church is the primary means of Christian growth. The five-fold ministry of Christians leadership mentioned in Ephesians 4:11-13 is indispensable for Christian growth. So Paul’s omission of “church” in his salutations of his last 4 church letters should NOT be interpreted as Paul’s “developing theology” in which the visible church matters less than maverick saints.

Episode Scripture References -

Ephesians 4:11-13, 1 Corinthians 12:28, Acts 2:46

More About This Episode -

In this episode titled “Paul and ‘Established’ Religion,” hosted by Victor Vigorito and introduced by Voiceover, Victor addresses a specific question about the Apostle Paul’s letters, particularly focusing on the absence of the word “saints” in his salutation to the Galatians.


Victor begins by noting that in most of Paul’s letters, he includes the term “saints” when addressing church congregations. However, in his letters to the Galatians, as well as to the Thessalonians, he instead uses the term “church.” He poses the question of whether Paul’s omission of “saints” was intentional and if it relates to legalism.


Victor argues that it wasn’t a deliberate omission but rather a result of the chronological order in which the letters were written. He explains that Galatians is the earliest letter, written around 48-49 AD, followed by the Thessalonian letters in 50 AD, where “church” is used instead of “saints.” In contrast, his later letters, such as First and Second Corinthians (written in 54-55 AD), include both terms, and he emphasizes the connection between being sanctified in Christ and being called saints.


As he examines subsequent letters, he highlights that Paul begins to refer to believers exclusively as “saints” in Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, and Philippians, raising the question of why he chooses not to mention “church” in these epistles. Victor discusses the implications of using the term “saint,” emphasizing that it is an individual designation that highlights one’s identity in Christ rather than a collective label.


He stresses that the term “saint” signifies a holy one set apart for God’s purposes, grounding this identity in the grace of Christ rather than personal merit. He references Biblical verses to support his claims, urging listeners to embrace their identity as saints based on the finished work of Christ and to walk in accordance with this identity.

Key Terms From This Episode -

Main Theme: Why does Apostle Paul not refer to Galatian believers as saints in his letter?

    Key Points:

  • Omission not deliberate; relates to the chronological order of letters
  • Paul starts using “saints” in Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, and Philippians
  • Significance of “saint”: Individual identity in Christ vs. collective label
  • “Saint” signifies a holy one set apart for God’s purposes, rooted in Christ’s grace
  • Later letters (1st & 2nd Corinthians, 54-55 AD): Include both “church” and “saints”
  • Episode Scripture References -

    Ephesians 4:11-13, 1 Corinthians 12:28, Acts 2:46

    More About This Episode -

    In this episode titled “Paul and ‘Established’ Religion,” hosted by Victor Vigorito and introduced by Voiceover, Victor addresses a specific question about the Apostle Paul’s letters, particularly focusing on the absence of the word “saints” in his salutation to the Galatians.


    Victor begins by noting that in most of Paul’s letters, he includes the term “saints” when addressing church congregations. However, in his letters to the Galatians, as well as to the Thessalonians, he instead uses the term “church.” He poses the question of whether Paul’s omission of “saints” was intentional and if it relates to legalism.


    Victor argues that it wasn’t a deliberate omission but rather a result of the chronological order in which the letters were written. He explains that Galatians is the earliest letter, written around 48-49 AD, followed by the Thessalonian letters in 50 AD, where “church” is used instead of “saints.” In contrast, his later letters, such as First and Second Corinthians (written in 54-55 AD), include both terms, and he emphasizes the connection between being sanctified in Christ and being called saints.


    As he examines subsequent letters, he highlights that Paul begins to refer to believers exclusively as “saints” in Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, and Philippians, raising the question of why he chooses not to mention “church” in these epistles. Victor discusses the implications of using the term “saint,” emphasizing that it is an individual designation that highlights one’s identity in Christ rather than a collective label.


    He stresses that the term “saint” signifies a holy one set apart for God’s purposes, grounding this identity in the grace of Christ rather than personal merit. He references Biblical verses to support his claims, urging listeners to embrace their identity as saints based on the finished work of Christ and to walk in accordance with this identity.

    Key Terms From This Episode -

    Main Theme: Why does Apostle Paul not refer to Galatian believers as saints in his letter?

      Key Points:

  • Omission not deliberate; relates to the chronological order of letters
  • Paul starts using “saints” in Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, and Philippians
  • Significance of “saint”: Individual identity in Christ vs. collective label
  • “Saint” signifies a holy one set apart for God’s purposes, rooted in Christ’s grace
  • Later letters (1st & 2nd Corinthians, 54-55 AD): Include both “church” and “saints”
  • MORE KINGDOM QUESTION SERIES